Why currants are better than raisins

In a discussion on the relative benefits of currants and raisins, vegetable95 claimed the superiority of raisins.

Simply put, vegetable95 doesn’t know what he’s talking about when it comes dried grapes. The currant (specifally, the Zante currant) is small and sweet. It is, for it’s size, intensely juicy, almost requiring a bib. It’s size-to-sweet-juice ratio is exactly why the currant is superior to the raisin. The raisin is inefficient, and is a perfect example of what juice economists call the juice diseconomies of scale with respect to fruit size.

So what’s with vegetable95’s love of the large raisin? Perhaps he’s overcompensating for something?



2 Responses to Why currants are better than raisins

  1. vegetable95 says:

    I hate to say it, but this is one of those rare instances where armchair economics has led us astray. While it may be true that currants are juicy for their size, one must not fail to take into account the importance of surface area. Owing to their small size, currants have a vastly higher ratio of surface area to volume than do raisins. The skin being the driest part of currants and raisins alike, this is enough to overwhelm the diseconomies of scale cited in the article. Had therecreationalvegan actually left the comfort of his office to observe currants and raisins in the field, he might not have omitted this important fact.

  2. markiejoe says:

    Nope, currants are definitely tastier, whether by themselves or in cakes or cookies. Currants all the way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: